HOLO-POIESIS

Do Process Buddhists Believe in ‘God’?

Sometimes I use the word ‘God’ in my reflections and I use it both sincerely and ironically. It’s ironic because I’m a Buddhist and Buddhists have always criticized and deflated the notion of a monotheistic creator or absolute supreme being. But it’s also sincere because I understand what…

Pan-Experientialism of the Heart-Mind

Perhaps implicit in the original formulation but made explicit through Process Buddhism, the Whiteheadian Process notion that all actual entities in the entire universe feel some level of experience — from the tiniest quantum fluctuation to the most complex organisms and everything in between — resuscitates a more…

Is Class Society Historically Necessary or Contingent?

The question of whether class society first emerged in ancient times as a necessary historical function of economic development predicated on surplus production, or a historically contingent imposition through voluntary force, seems to implicitly assume a mind-matter, subject-object distinction, one in which the physical conditions of life and…

On The “Queer Realism” of Trans Experience

Trans people tend to be either “realist” or “idealist” about their gender identities: the realists tend to try and ground their identities on an essential, objective substratum (the most popular form being a neuroessentialist reduction of transgender identity to supposed “brain-sex” differences) while the idealists appeal to the…

Democratizing Divinity with Process Buddhism

One of the “innovations” of Process Buddhism is a certain democratization and pluralization of the function of “God” in Whitehead’s original articulation of his process-relational metaphysics. Rather than there being a single divine element offering the value hierarchies by which we can drive our own development, there is…

Notes on The Third Ultimate in Process Buddhism

As I research and design Process Buddhism, I’ve come to understand the unity of the two ultimates of open/emptiness and inclusive-transcendence in three different ways, where the two ultimates are different aspects of a “third” ultimate: holopoiesis (my own novel concept), power, and love. I came to these…

Nāgārjuna, Trans-Philosophy & Becoming-Sophianic

I would consider Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka works (the “yukti-corpus”) to be “trans-philosophical,” which is to say that he (as the prefix “trans-” suggests) goes “beyond” or “across” philosophy. His works are not philosophical, because they do not attempt to build a system of thought that speculatively induces or transcendentally…

The Pure Form of Power

I believe that any and every instance of power is an empowered process empowering others to participate in the “creordering” (creative re-ordering) of a given social organization — power is not a “thing” that a single, isolated individual or even group of individuals can “possess,”; it is a…

Hypermodernity and Gluteal Amnesia

Under conditions of hypermodernity, sedentary life predominates over nomadic life, and our asses suffer as a consequence. During hypermodernity, both production and consumption are predominantly cognitive or intellectual in nature rather than physical or manual, and they are increasingly mediated by the use of “computer terminals” (broadly construed,…